2015 winners and runners-up

Science student reading results

Find out more about the winners and runners-up from the 2015 UWE Bristol SCU Science Writing Competition.

20 and under

Winner:

Emily Clements (aged 14): Charging Ahead with the Future
A look at research into the aluminium-ion based batteries that could replace today’s ubiquitous lithium-ion batteries and transform the way we store energy.

The judges said: “Emily’s story is a delight to read. It addresses an issue we are all obsessed with – keeping our mobile phones charged, and presents us with what looks like a feasible fix for a frustration we all face. Given Emily’s age, her writing is outstanding.”

Read Emily's winning entry: Charging Ahead with the Future .

Runner-up:

Bernard Sarmiento (aged 19): Neuroscience will Transform our Future
How neuroscientists are exploring one of ‘humanity’s final frontiers’, the human brain, and investigating ways to treat neurodegenerative diseases or enhance our abilities.

The judges said: “Using the explorer Roald Amundsen as a way to introduce a story about neuroscience is imaginative and catches the reader’s attention. Bernard has an engaging and authoritative writing style the ensures the reader stays hooked.”

Highly recommended:

Amy Newman (aged 20): The Male Contraceptive Pill
Highlighting research currently taking place to develop a male contraceptive pill.

The judges said: “Tackling this topic is a brave undertaking and Amy explains the science with clarity. The only thing that is lacking is some consideration of the wider social issues that would surround the implementation of a male contraceptive pill.”

21 and over

Winner:

Emily Coyte (aged 24): The Spectrum in Your Pocket

Looking at the development of tiny spectrometers we could carry in our pockets and use to detect what’s inside everything from a glass of wine to a pill we’re about to take.

The judges said: “Emily’s choice of topic is original and she wrote about it with credibility and authority; she made a convincing case that this is technology we should sit up and pay attention to. She does this while explaining the science beautifully. Emily is clearly a talented writer.”

Read Emily's winning entry: The Spectrum in Your Pocket.

Runner-up:

Matthew Warren (aged 26): Brain Stimulation Could Revolutionise Treatment of Depression

Exploring the science of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) and how it could be used as a treatment for depression.

The judges said:  “Matthew started his article with an account of being involved with research himself and this grabs the reader’s attention from the outset. He has a lively, direct writing style and addresses the cons as well as the pros of tDCS. We admire his bravery in letting himself be a guinea pig in research!”
 
 The judges said of the entries overall:
“We were impressed by the overall standard of entries – there is some real science writing talent out there and reading through the entries was a pleasure. Thank-you to everyone who took part.”

About the competition

The competition was organised by the University of the West of England’s Science Communication Unit, which provides courses in science writing and all other forms of science communication in conjunction with Focus, the BBC’s science magazine.

Interested in writing about science?

If you would like to get involved, then enter UWE Bristol's SCU Science Writing Competition 2016.

Back to top