Grounds for appeal
The information on this page relates to exam boards taking place in 2017.
The grounds on which you can appeal given
in H27.4R of Appendix H2 of the
Academic Regulations and Procedure 2016/2017 are limited to
instances where there has been material and significant
administrative error or other material irregularity – such that the
assessments were not conducted in accordance with the approved
regulations for the module/award, ie instances where you believe
the University has done something wrong.
These could include:
- marks that have been recorded wrongly
- assessments not conducted or calculated in the way described in the module specification or guide
- lack of agreed reasonable adjustments
- a rejected application for extenuating circumstances which you feel has not been considered properly.
Things that are not grounds for appeal
You cannot use the appeal procedure to:
- Submit an application for Extenuating Circumstances (that is significant personal difficulties or circumstances which impact on your ability to complete, submit or attend a specific assessment, and are significantly disruptive matters outside of your control). In case of late or retrospective submission of ECs, please refer to the late extenuating circumstances guidance.
- Complain retrospectively about dissatisfaction with teaching or service-related provision, including supervision. Students need to use the University’s Complaints Procedure to raise issues at the time they are occurring so that the University has the opportunity to put measures in place.
- Complain about a mark or other properly exercised academic judgement, simply because you have worked hard and feel you deserve better. ‘Academic Judgement’ is a judgement that is made about a matter where only the opinion of an academic expert is sufficient.
Consent for third party representation
Find out about appointing someone to act on your behalf.
Resources to support you with making an appeal: